Meta-Analytic Insights into the Efficacy of Digital and Traditional Data Collection Methods

Taufik Aditiyawarman

Authors

Taufik Aditiyawarman Indonesia Author

Keywords:

digital data collection, online surveys, research methodology, data validity

Abstract

This meta-analytic study examines the efficacy of digital versus traditional data collection methods across various fields of research. The growing prevalence of digital data collection tools, such as online surveys and electronic health records, has raised questions about their comparative effectiveness and reliability relative to traditional methods like paper-based surveys and face-to-face interviews. By aggregating data from numerous studies conducted before 2019, this analysis evaluates the validity, reliability, response rates, and overall data quality of these methods. The findings highlight that while digital methods offer significant advantages in terms of convenience and cost-efficiency, traditional methods still maintain superior response rates and depth of information in certain contexts. This study provides comprehensive insights into the strengths and limitations of each approach, guiding researchers in selecting the most appropriate data collection method for their specific needs.

References

Ball, H. L. (2016). Conducting online surveys. Journal of Human Lactation, 32(2), 287-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334416651456

Denscombe, M. (2009). Item non-response rates: A comparison of online and paper questionnaires. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 281-291. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570802054706

Evans, J. R., & Mathur, A. (2005). The value of online surveys. Internet Research, 15(2), 195-219. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240510590360

Kaplowitz, M. D., Hadlock, T. D., & Levine, R. (2004). A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 94-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfh006

Lozar Manfreda, K., Bosnjak, M., Berzelak, J., Haas, I., & Vehovar, V. (2008). Web surveys versus other survey modes: A meta-analysis comparing response rates. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 79-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530805000107

Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 409-432. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024232915870

Shih, T. H., & Fan, X. (2008). Comparing response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.01.003

Sahoo, A. M. (2018). Performance Evaluation of Network Management Protocols in IoT Deployments. Journal of Recent Trends in Computer Science and Engineering (JRTCSE), 6(1), 15-27.

Smyth, J. D., Dillman, D. A., Christian, L. M., & O'Neill, A. (2010). Using the internet to survey small towns and communities: Limitations and possibilities in the early 21st century. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(9), 1423-1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209356249

Sue, V. M., & Ritter, L. A. (2012). Conducting online surveys. Sage Publications.

Tourangeau, R., Conrad, F. G., & Couper, M. P. (2013). The science of web surveys. Oxford University Press.