The Role of AI in Customizing Prosthetic Devices: Framework for Development and User Engagement

Guinosao C Benedict

Authors

Guinosao C Benedict University of Eastern Pangasinan, Philippines Author

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Customization, Machine Learning, User Engagement, Assistive Technology, Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly contributed to the customization of prosthetic devices, enhancing user experience, comfort, and functionality. This paper explores a framework that integrates AI in prosthetics development, focusing on user-centered design, machine learning algorithms for personalization, and real-time data analysis for improved adaptability. Empirical data is analyzed to demonstrate AI's impact on usability, cost reduction, and performance. The study also discusses challenges, including data security, ethical concerns, and technological limitations. The paper concludes with recommendations for future AI-driven prosthetic customization.

References

Biddiss, E., & Chau, T. (2007). Upper-limb prosthetics: Critical factors in device abandonment. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 86(12), 977-987.

Englehart, K., & Hudgins, B. (2003). A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 50(7), 848-854.

Fougner, A., Scheme, E., Chan, A. D., Englehart, K., & Stavdahl, Ø. (2011). Resolving the limb position effect in myoelectric pattern recognition. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 19(6), 644-651.

Hargrove, L. J., Lock, B. A., & Kuiken, T. A. (2015). Pattern recognition control outperforms conventional myoelectric control in upper limb amputees. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 23(1), 119-126.

Herr, H. M., & Grabowski, A. M. (2012). Bionic ankle-foot prosthesis normalizes walking gait for persons with leg amputation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1728), 457-464.

Resnik, L., Klinger, S. L., & Etter, K. (2013). The DEKA Arm: Its features, functionality, and acceptance following field testing. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 50(6), 743-754.

Ajiboye, A. B., & Weir, R. F. (2009). Muscle synergies as a predictive framework for the EMG patterns of new hand postures. Journal of Neural Engineering, 6(3), 036004.

Cipriani, C., Controzzi, M., & Carrozza, M. C. (2011). The SmartHand transradial prosthesis. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 8(1), 29.

Miguelez, J. M., Lake, C., & Conyers, D. (2003). Advances in upper-limb myoelectric prosthetics: State-of-the-art review. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, 15(2), 59-68.

Ortiz-Catalan, M., Håkansson, B., & Brånemark, R. (2014). An osseointegrated human-machine gateway for long-term sensory feedback and motor control of artificial limbs. Science Translational Medicine, 6(257), 257re6.

Raspopovic, S., Capogrosso, M., Petrini, F. M., et al. (2014). Restoring natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand prostheses. Science Translational Medicine, 6(222), 222ra19.

Schultz, A. E., & Kuiken, T. A. (2011). Neural interfaces for control of upper limb prostheses: The state of the art and future possibilities. PM&R, 3(1), 55-67.

Ziegler-Graham, K., MacKenzie, E. J., Ephraim, P. L., Travison, T. G., & Brookmeyer, R. (2008). Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(3), 422-429.