Quantitative Approaches to Measuring the Societal Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Technologies

Joseph M Reed

Authors

Joseph M Reed Author

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence (AI), Societal Acceptance, Quantitative Analysis, Trust in Technology, Ethical AI

Abstract

The societal acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has become a critical focus of research as these systems increasingly permeate various domains of human activity. This paper explores quantitative approaches to measuring societal acceptance of AI, emphasizing the use of structured methodologies to gauge public perceptions, attitudes, and trust. By synthesizing empirical studies, this research identifies key factors influencing acceptance, such as transparency, ethical considerations, and perceived utility. Quantitative tools, including surveys, statistical modeling, sentiment analysis, and experimental designs, are evaluated for their effectiveness in capturing nuanced societal responses. The study also highlights the importance of demographic variations and cultural contexts in shaping acceptance levels. This work aims to contribute to the development of robust frameworks for policymakers and developers to align AI advancements with public expectations and ethical standards.

References

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. doi:10.2307/30036540

McKnight, D. H., Carter, M., Thatcher, J. B., & Clay, P. F. (2011). Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 2(2), 1-25. doi:10.1145/1985347.1985353

Cowls, J., & Floridi, L. (2018). Prolegomena to a white paper on an ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707. doi:10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

Zhang, B., Dafoe, A., & Anderljung, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence and societal trust: Evidence from an online experiment. Science Advances, 7(18), eabe5939. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abe5939

Shneiderman, B. (2020). Bridging the gap between ethics and practice: Guidelines for reliable, safe, and trustworthy human-centered AI systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 10(4), 1-31. doi:10.1145/3419764

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). The business of artificial intelligence: What it can and cannot do for your organization. Harvard Business Review, 95(4), 1-11.

Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389-399. doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2

West, S. M., Whittaker, M., & Crawford, K. (2019). Discriminating systems: Gender, race, and power in AI. AI Now Institute.